Md. Kalim @ Kali @ Md. Kalimuddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25120 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -341 Year- 2017 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ====================================================== Md. Kalim @ Kali @ Md. Kalimuddin, S/o Hidyat Ali , R/o Nimarang , P.S. and District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Jamui P.S. Case No. 341 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 153(A), 295(A), 298 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. His name has come during investigation.

The learned Sessions Judge has mentioned in the impugned order that name of this petitioner has come in the supervision note of the Superintendent of Police as mentioned in paragraph-37 of the case diary.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25120 of 2018 (3) dt.17-05-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No. 341 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T