Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24850 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2017 Thana -KHAGARIA District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Singh, S/o Balmiki Singh, R/o Vill.- Maranch, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar,Adv, For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Khagaria P.S. Case No. 139 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 406, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not named in the written report. The co-accused persons namely, Daho Singh @ Lalan Kumar and Pato Kumar have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 05.04.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.7466 of 2018. It has further been submitted that informant herself filed a petition in the court below stating that she has filed the instant case against the accused persons under the influence of others.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24850 of 2018 (3) dt.17-05-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 139 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.
U T