Sonu @ Bharat Kumar Lal And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23717 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2018 Thana -PARWALPUR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Sonu @ Bharat Kumar Lal,

2. Munna Mahani @ Munna Mahari @ Satyapal Mahani, Both sons of Jitendra Kumar Mahani, Resident of Village- Pillich, P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda.

3. Biten Mahani alias Satpul Mahani,

4. Bhupendra Mahani @ Bhupendra Kumar,

5. Sunil Mahani @ Hitendra Kumar, Pet. No. 3,4 and 5 are sons of Nandlal Mahani, Resident of Village- Pillich, P.S.- Parwalpur, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Parwalpur P.S.Case No.08 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 307, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner nos. 2 and 5 have been arrested, as such the application against them has become in fractuous. Allegation against the petitioners is that they dragged the daughter of the informant from the bus and also misbehaved with her on 20.1.2018 and later on 22.1.2018 they came and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23717 of 2018 (4) dt.17-05-2018 2/2 assaulted for demand of rangdari.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that though the whole case is false and concocted as there was dispute between the parties, who is a driver and bus owner with respect to loading of the passengers and for that he has been falsely implicated and it has also been submitted that money was due with the informant of the petitioner, as such he has been falsely implicated in this case.

Heard learned A.P.P.

Having heard both sides and in view of nature of the cases, this is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail, however, if the petitioners surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, the same will be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court and if possible, it will be disposed of on the same day. With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T