Jai Prakash Singh @ Manjhil Singh @ Majhil v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.27132 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2012 Thana -SIMRI District- BUXAR ====================================================== Jai Prakash Singh @ Manjhil Singh @ Majhil S/o Purendra Singh Resident of Village Balihar, P.S. Simria, District Buxar (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Nr. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07/ 04-03-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 05.03.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)/25/27A/29/32 of the NDPS Act. From the house of Purendra Singh 494 kgs.
of Ganja were recovered when 2-4 persons escaped from the scene. The wife of the petitioner was found present at the place of seizure.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and on suspicion the petitioner has been roped in the present case.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27132 of 2014 (07) dt.04-03-2015 2/2 The contention of learned Senior counsel for the petitioner that no seizure has been made from the petitioner has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the State after going through the case diary.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Buxar in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 37 of 2012 (N.D.P.S. Case No. 04 of 2012).
Considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he substantially gets involved in some serious nature of the offence or defaults for two consecutive occasions.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T