Anuvesh Kumar Yadav @ Pintu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Revision No.446 of 2015 ====================================================== Anuvesh Kumar Yadav @ Pintu Kumar Yadav, son of Mahesh Yadav, resident of village-Baluan, P.S.-Brahampur, District- Buxar through his mother and natural guardian Urmila Devi, wife of Mahesh Yadav, resident of village-Baluan, P.S.-Brahampur, district- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 4/ 01-10-2015 This Revision Application has been filed against the judgment and order dated 06.05.2015 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Buxar, in Cr. Appeal (Juvenile) No.08 of 2015 whereby he has affirmed the order dated 25.02.2015 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Buxar, in JJB No.544 of 2015 arising out of Brahampur (Nanijor) P.S. Case No.327 of 2014. Considering that the Petitioner has fair antecedents and his mother undertakes his responsibility, let the Petitioner, above named, be released provisionally for a period of six months on furnishing bond of `5,000/-(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board, Buxar, in connection with Brahampur P.S. Case No.327 of 2014, subject to the conditions:
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.446 of 2015 (4) dt.01-10-2015 2/3 (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner.
The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bond on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bond will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bond will be liable to be cancelled.
In the nature of the case, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Head Priest of local Mandir situated within his
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.446 of 2015 (4) dt.01-10-2015 3/3 home town, within fifteen days of his release on provisional bond for a period of six months and file a certificate about the same in the court within the stipulated time. In case, the petitioner fails to file certificate about reporting to the Head Priest within two weeks of his release from custody, notice shall be sent to him for cancellation of his bond. During the period of six months, the petitioner is expected to engage himself in fruitful activities under the guidance of the Head Priest and at the end of the six months, the petitioner will be required to file a certificate of his conduct before the Juvenile Justice Board granted by the Head Priest. If the certificate granted to the petitioner is found satisfactory, the court below will confirm the provisional bond of the petitioner or else will issue notice for cancellation of bond. The application stands allowed.
(Anjana Prakash, J) JA/- U T