Mantun Paswan@Mantu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28758 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2012 Thana -PATEPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Rohit Sahni Son of Musafir Sahni Resident of Village - Kajipur Thathan, P.S. - Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.28833 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -139 Year- 2012 Thana -PATEPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Mantun Paswan @ Mantu Paswan Son of Late Mahesh Paswan Resident of Village - Asadharpur, P.O. Thathan Buzurg, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.28758 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vasant Vikas, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Aslam Ansari (App) (In Cr.Misc. No.28833 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sri Krishna Ranjan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Roy(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2015 Heard both sides.
The petitioners seek bail in Patepur P.S. Case No. 139 of 2012, registered for the offences punishable under Section 302 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3 and 4 of Explosive Substances Act and 17 of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28758 of 2015 (2) dt.06-08-2015 2/2 C.L.A. Act.
The informant alleged that 25-30 naxalites came and made indiscriminate firing in which her husband and son died. Petitioners are not named in the FIR. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Name of the petitioner figured in the case in the confessional statement of Ravindra Sahni and Dilip Sahni. Except the confession the Investigating Officer did not collect any cogent and tangible evidence. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners above named aew directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No. 139 of 2012.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) Rakhi/- U T