Indu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15846 of 2022 ====================================================== Indu Devi Wife of Suraj Dev Sahani, Resident of Village Thaahar Hardoi Tola, Ward No. 16, P.S.-Runnisaidpur, District-Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.

The Collector, Sitamarhi.

5.

The District Programmer Officer, Sitamarhi.

6.

The Child Development Officer, Sitamarhi.

7.

The Child Development Supervisor, Runnisaidpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr.Ugranath Mallik, Advocate Mr. Bimal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prashant Pratap (GP-2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of a writ of Certiorari for quashing the order dated 15.06.2021 passed in Anganwari Appeal No.

24/2020 (Annexure-8) by which the learned Collector, Sitamarhi affirmed the order of termination and also quashing the Memo No. 1620 issued dated 27.06.2019 (Annexure-6) by which the District Programme Officer, Sitamarhi without considering the material facts available on records as well as direction of the senior officers terminated the petitioner on the post

Patna High Court CWJC No.15846 of 2022(2) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 of Anganwari Sahayika and also issuance of writ of Mandamus directing / commanding the respondents to not to treated petitioner as terminated employees and not to interfere in the smooth functioning of the Anganwari Centre No. 272 situated in Harari Tola, Runnisaidpur Block and also passed any other order/orders as the petitioner may be entitled to."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U