Rinku Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15426 of 2022 ====================================================== Rinku Kumari Wife of Sunil Kumar, Resident of Village and P.O.- Baligarh, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.

The Collector, Sitamarhi.

5.

The District Programmer Officer, Sitamarhi.

6.

The Child Development Officer, Sitamarhi.

7.

The Child Development Supervisor, Runnisaidpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ugranath Mallik, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Dr.Md. Raisul Haque (SC-10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 5.06.2021 passed in Anganwari Appeal No. 26/2020 (Annexure-6) by which the learned Collector, Sitamarhi affirming the order for termination and also quashing the Memo No. 1620 issued dated 26.07.2019 (Annexure-8) by which the District Programmer Officer, Sitamarhi without considering the material facts available on records as well as direction of the senior officers terminated the petitioner on the post of Anganwari Sevika and also

Patna High Court CWJC No.15426 of 2022(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 issuance of writ of Mandamus directing/commanding the respondents to not to treated petitioner as terminated employees and not to interfere in the smooth functioning of the Anganwari Centre No. 272 situated in Harari Tola, Runnisaidpur block."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U