Patna High CourtMJC/3921/2012disposed

Umesh Chandra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-04Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3921 of 2012 ====================================================== Umesh Chandra S/O Late Radha Krishna Das R/O Mohalla - North Side of Ray Saheb Tank, Laheriyasarai, P.S. Laheriyasarai, District - Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Sri Amarjeet Sinha

2. The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga, Dr. Samrendra Pratap Singh

3. The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga, Dr. Vijay Prasad Singh .... .... Opp.Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to AAG-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER ........................

04-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to AAG-10 and Sri Chandra Mohan Singh, learned counsel for Lalit Narayan Mithila University.

The present petition has been filed with a prayer to initiate contempt proceeding against Opp.Parties on an allegation of wilful disobedience to an order dated 24.11.2011 passed in C.W.J.C.No.20020 of 2011. By the said order, with consent of parties, the writ petition was disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before Respondent no.3 i.e. Registrar of the University and the Registrar of the University was directed to examine the grievances of the petitioner and pass a

Patna High Court MJC No.3921 of 2012 (8) dt.04-02-2015 2/2 reasoned order.

In this case, a show cause has been filed on behalf of the Registrar of the University and along with show cause, a reasoned order has been brought on record as Annexure-A to the show cause. Learned counsel for the University submits that even grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed and a reasoned order has been passed.

Keeping in view the fact that in compliance with the order of the writ court, grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed and a reasoned order has already been passed, there is no need to further proceed with the matter. The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U