Satyadeo Ji Prasad @ Pappu Jee v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24439 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -402 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAPRA TOWN District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Satyadeo Ji Prasad @ Pappu Jee son of Sri Bishwanath Prasad resident of Tahsil School, Ramlila Maidan, Japilganj Baliya, P.S. Baliya, District Baliya (U.P.).

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shital Kumari D/o - Sri Prahlad Narayan Prasad At present resident of Sri Nandan Path Dahiyawa Tola, Chapra, P.O. Chapra, P.S. - Chapra Town, District - Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Udai Shankar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal : Mr. Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No.402/2016 for the offences instituted under Sections 323, 498(A), 379, 386 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24439 of 2017 (3) dt.25-08-2017 2/2 petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and counsel for the informant, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No.402/2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T