Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67732 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2021 Thana- GURARU District- Gaya ====================================================== ARCHANA KUMARI Wife of Rajiv Ranjan Resident of village - Barorah, P.S.- Guraru, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that work under MANREGA Scheme was completed in Baroh Panchayat in Guraru Block through J.C.B. machine in violation of MANREGA Scheme, accordingly District Magistrate had directed for lodging an FIR against the accused persons, including the petitioner, who were responsible for execution and implementation of MANREGA Scheme. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case without

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67732 of 2021(2) dt.20-07-2022 2/2 holding any proper inquiry and the petitioner was not given any opportunity to explain his case, it is next submitted that petitioner is Mukhiya, it is also submitted that even the inquiry report does not conclusively hold that the work was done by a J.C.B. machine, and it is not the case of the prosecution that no work was done. It is next submitted that co-accused Md. Zafar Kaifi Ansari has been granted bail vide order dated 11.07.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 57322 of 2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Guraru P.S. Case No. 78 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) shivam/- U T