Marani Devi v. Deo Narain Roy And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.21902 of 2012 (02) dt.18-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21902 of 2012 ======================================================
1. MARANI DEVI WIFE OF LATE INDRADEO RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPAKARIA, P.O.- BABURBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI .... .... PETITIONER/S
VERSUS
1. DEO NARAIN ROY SON OF LATE ZALIM ROY RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPAKARIA, P.O.- BABURBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI
2. RAMKEWAL ROY SON OF LATE ZALIM ROY RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPAKARIA, P.O.- BABURBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI
3. SUNAINA DEVI WIFE OF KAPILDEO ROY ALIAS KAPAL ROY OF VILLAGEPAKARIA, P.O.- BABURBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI
4. URMILA DEVI WIFE OF RAM PRASAD ROY RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPAKARIA, P.O.- BABURBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI AT PRESENT VILLAGE- MALAHI, P.S.- BELA, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI
5. NISAKHA DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE SONAFI ROY, WIFE OF KAPILDEO RAI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BABURBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI
6. RAM KUMARI DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE SONFI ROY, WIFE OF BINDESHWAR ROY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE + P.O.- BABURBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI
7. RAMKALI DEVI DAUGHTER OF LATE SONFI ROY, WIFE OF SHANKAR ROY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BENIPUR, P.O.- KATHAUR, P.S.- PARSAUNI, DISTRICTSITAMARHI
8. RANJAN ROY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PAKARIA, P.O.- BABOORBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI
9. LALIT ROY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PAKARIA, P.O.- BABOORBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI
10. PAPPU ROY SON OF KAPILDEO ROY (MINOR SON OF LATE KAPILDEO ROY UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF SMT. SUNAINA DEVI) RESIDENT OF VILLAGEPAKARIA, P.O.- BABOORBAN, P.S.- PARIHAR, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI .... .... RESPONDENT/S ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hans Lal Kumar--Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 18-01-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of instant petition in order to move before the learned Appellate Court under OrderXLI, Rule-5 of the C.P.C. With the aforesaid liberty, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) Vikash/- U