Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26800/2017rejected

Ranjan Kumar Singh @ Dhappu Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26800 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26800 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2017 Thana -NAYAGAON District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Ranjan Kumar Singh @ Dhappu Singh, Son of Rajeshwar Singh,

2. Rakesh Kuamr @ Rakesh Singh @ Karu Singh @ Karu, Son of Late Shiv Narayan Singh, Both are of Resident of Village- Harpur Nand, Police Station- Nayagaon, District- Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Nayagaon P.S Case No. 07 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 504, 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, the petitioners and co-accused at the point of Katta and showing fear of murder of her children, committed rape one after another and further snatched Mangalsutra, ear-ring and Payal.

Submission is of false implication and that occurrence is of 01.01.2017 whereas, complainant case was filed

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26800 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 on 12.01.2017, no explanation has been given for delay in lodging the case. There is land dispute between the parties. There is no corroborative material against the petitioners and, as such, the petitioners deserve sympathetic consideration Learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer of pre-arrest bail by submitting that the petitioners have committed serious and heinous crime.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners and accordingly, their prayer stands rejected in connection with Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 07 of 2017 pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M. XIII, Saran at Chapra. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T