Baban Lal And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28220 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -141 Year- 2012 Thana -KOCHAS District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Baban Lal, Son of Late Inder Lal,
2. Prabhawati Devi, Wife of Baban Lal,
3. Sri Ram Lal @ Sri Ram lal Son of Baban Lal,
4. Rantideo Lal, Son of Baban Lal,
5. Manju Devi, Wife of Rantideo Lal,
6. Guddu Lal, Son of Baban Lal,
7. Durgawati Devi, Wife of Guddu Lal,
8. Sriman Lal, Son of Baban Lal,
9. Ramawati Devi, Wife of Sriman Lal,
10. Ajay Lal, Son of Baban Lal,
11. Chandrakanti Devi, Wife of Ajay Lal,
12. Santu Lal, Son of Sanjay Lal, All resident of Village- Kochas, P.S.- Kochas, District- Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Sudha Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioners killed the daughter of the informant due to nonfulfilment of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28220 of 2017 (3) dt.06-07-2017 2/2 of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. After investigation the police has submitted a final form against the petitioners. The petitioners are separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased.
On behalf of the State and the learned counsel for the informant, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 8th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sasaram at Rohtas in connection with Sessions Trial No.479 of 2014 arising out of Kochas P.S. case No.141 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T