Sanjay Yadav And ORS v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9498 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Sanjay Yadav Son of Bharat Yadav, resident of Village- Mutulpur, P.S.- Teghra, District- Begusarai.

2. Arun Kumar Mahto, Son of Bhola Mahto, resident of VillageMokhtiyarpur, P.S.-Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur.

3. Nesar Ahmed, Son of Hidaytullah Miyan, resident of Village- Saidpur Baghi, P.S.- Dighwara, District- Chapra.

4. Sunil Kumar Ambedkar, Son of Heera Lal, resident of VillageMasoomganj, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, District- Saran.

5. Narayan Paswan, Son of Bavikshan Paswan, resident of VillageHabaspur, P.S.- Baraunio, District- Begusarai.

6. Bharat Bhushan Sharma, Son of Bhuvneshwar Sharma, resident of Village- Baro Gachhi Tola, P.S.- Phulwariya, District- Begusarai.

7. Bhola Paswan, Son of Ram Bharos Paswan, resident of VillageChalklokman/Mahuatol, Ward No. 8, Nagar Panchayat/Dassingsarai, P.S.- Dassingsarai, District- Samastipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Chairman, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi.

2. General Manager, Eastern Cenbtral Railway, Hajipur.

3. Divisional Railway Manager, Sonepur.

4. Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Sonepur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT 06-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner claims appointment in Railways and Railways is covered by the provision of Section 14 of Administrative Tribunal Act, this writ petition is both ill-advised and misconceived.

3. When such an observation has been made, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this case in order

Patna High Court CWJC No.9498 of 2015 (2) dt.06-07-2015 2/2 to enable the petitioner to move before the competent Tribunal.

4. This writ application is, accordingly, permitted to be withdrawn with the aforementioned liberty.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U