Raghuvansh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58382 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Raghuvansh Singh S/o Late Baijnath Singh R/o Village- Itahari, P.S.- Rasulpur, Dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Informant :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mrs. Shyama Rani, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has assaulted with an iron rod on the head of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58382 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 case. He also submits that there is also a counter version of this case which was filed before this case and it has also been submitted that in that case, the petitioner has also received injury. It has also been submitted that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.04.2025.

5. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned counsel for the informant and the learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Saran at Chapra in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T