Md. Jaan Ansari @ Mohammad Jaan Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.858 of 2018 (05) dt.04-07-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.858 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2008 Thana -DURGAWATI District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Md. Jaan Ansari @ Mohammad Jaan Ansari, son of Karmullah Ansari, resident of Village- Atariya, P.S.- Durgawati, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Neeraj Gupta @ Neeraj Kumar Gupta, son of Amrish Prasad Gupta,

3. Amrish Prasad Gupta, son of Banarsi Gupta,

4. Pankaj Kumar Gupta, son of Amrish Prasad Gupta,

5. Sushila Devi, wife of Amrish Prasad Gupta,

6. Arvind Kumar Gupta, son of Amrish Prasad Gupta,

7. Madan Prasad Gupta, son of Banarsi Gupta, all are resident of VillageAtariya, P.S.- Durgawati, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Parwej Khan-Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar-A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 04-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

After going through the judgment impugned, it is evident that there happens to be no scope for interference. Consequent thereupon, instant memo of appeal is rejected.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J) Vikash/- U T