Patna High CourtCWJC/13301/2014disposed

Arun Kumar Prasad And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-09-12Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13301 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Arun Kumar Prasad Son of Rajendra Prasad Singh

2. Brajendra Prasad Son of Mahendra Prasad Both residents of village Moriyan p.s. Panapur, District Saran (Chapra). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. null null

4. The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Deputy Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Commissioner, Saran Division at Chapra.

7. The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

8. The Additional Director-cum-Chief Malaria Officer, Swasth Bhawan, Sultanganj, Patna.

9. The District Malaria Officer, Saran at Chapra. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Satya Deo Kumar, SC5 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to SC5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 11798 of 2011 (Mausami D.D.T. Chhirkao Kramchari Sangh & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case.

In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is

Patna High Court CWJC No.13301 of 2014 (2) dt.12-09-2018 2 /2 directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of petitioners and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioners.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny U