← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29554/2017bail granted

Chandan Kumar Roy v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29554 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2017 Thana -GANGTA District- MUNGER ======================================================

1. Chandan Kumar Roy Son of Late Shaija Nand Roy, resident of Raitola, Banhara, P.S.- Gangata, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamal Kishore Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

Vide order dated01.09.2017, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and reconciliation Centre but as per the report of the Mediator, the mediation has failed. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29554 of 2017 (4) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and counsel for the O.P. No.2, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Gangata P.S. Case No. 10 of 2017, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri N.K. Dubey, J.M.1st Class, Munger, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T