Sunita Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15219 of 2022 ====================================================== Sunita Devi W/o Late Pintu Ram, Resident of Village- Nadiauna, P.O.- Dahpar, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.- 800015 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhavan, New Secretariat, Patna- 800015. 3.
The Divisional Commissioner, Patna, Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 4.
The District Magistrate, Biharsharif.
5.
The District Program Officer, Nalanda, Bihar Sharif. 6.
The Child Development Project Officer, Noorsarai, Bihar Sharif. 7.
The Block Development Officer, Noorsarai Block, BiharSharif. 8.
Smt. Sulekha Devi Wife of Late Dharmendra Kumar, Resident of Ward No.- 09, Village- Nadiauna, P.O.- Dahpar, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda, Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pratyush Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Smt. Kumari Amrita (Gp3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "i) For issuance of an order (s) / direction (s) or appropriate writ(s) commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of "Sahayika" under the Integrated Child Development Scheme for ward no. 09 of Nadiauna panchayat situated in Nalanda district in place of respondent no. 8, as the respondent no. 8 has been appointed despite
Patna High Court CWJC No.15219 of 2022(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/2 being placed at serial no. 02 in the merit list due to wrong interpretation of the clause 4 and 5 of the Anganbadi Sevika / Sahaika Selection Guidelines, 2019;"
2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U