Shakila Begum And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30914 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Shakila Begum Wife of Md. Akhtar
2. Abu Bakar @ Bakar
3. Abu Talim @ Talim both sons of Md. Akhtar, All resident of village - Marui, P.S. Roh, in the district of Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Tamanna Begum Wife of Asgar, Daughter of Md. Umar resident of village - Marui, P.S. Roh, in the district of Nawada .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.S.Choudhary(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-07-2015 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Nawada Mahila Police Station Case No. 20 of 2015 for the offences instituted under Sections 498A/494/323/341 /376/379/307/504/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 3⁄4 of the D. P. Act. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
Prosecution case, in short, is that informant's husband has solemnized second marriage while she has three sons and one daughter. Her husband has pressurized her to bring Rs. 1,00000/- from her patents then she will be allowed to live otherwise kill her. On 01.05.205, all her in-laws after making plan assaulted her. It is also alleged that her father-in-law entered into her room in the night and established physical
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30914 of 2015 (2) dt.31-07-2015 2/2 relation and on protest used to threat that he would kill her. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Petitioner No.1 is motherin-law, petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are brother-in-laws of the informant. From the perusal of F.I.R. it appears that the main allegation is against husband and father-in-law of the informant. There is no specific allegation against these petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property from the husband of the informant.
On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioners shall be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Nawada Mahila P.S. Case No. 20 of 2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J.) Mkr./- U