Mustaqeem Ansari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17912 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -270 Year- 2017 Thana -ROHTAS District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Mustaqeem Ansari,

2. Md. Hakim Ansari, Both son of Nijamuddin Ansari, Resident of VillageKusdihra, P.S.- Rohtas, Distt- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Rohtas P.S.Case No.270 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and also pressing neck of the sister of the informant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is case and counter case between the parties and the injures are simple in nature.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17912 of 2018 (3) dt.01-05-2018 2/2 in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Dehri in connection with Rohtas P.S.Case nO.270 of 2017 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T