Shubh Narain Sah And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21048 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -202 Year- 2017 Thana -RAGHUNATHPUR District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Shubh Narain Sah, Son of Ramashish Sah

2. Kaushalya Devi, Wife of Shubh Narain Sah Both residents of Village - Parhiya, P.S. Raghunathpur, District Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni For the informant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Miss Rinki Kumri, Advocate.

Mr. Sandip Kumar, Advocate.

For the State : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 202 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 363 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged in the written report that daughter of the informant namely, Nitu Kumari aged about 17 years had gone for call of nature and thereafter she became traceless. The informant made search and learnt that his daughter has been taken away by the petitioners and other accused persons as named in the written report.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21048 of 2018 (4) dt.20-06-2018 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners has made submission in this Court on the last date that the girl has eloped with the son of petitioners namely, Vikash Sah. He was directed to give clue of the boy and girl on the next date. The counsel for petitioners has submitted that girl is traceless. The son of the petitioners is working in private Factory in Jamnagar. Case diary has been received.

The learned A.P.P. has submitted that the girl is still traceless. The witnesses have taken the name of these petitioners during investigation.

Learned counsel for the informant has appeared and submitted that the girl is still traceless and she has been taken away by the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Petitioners may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T