Nitu Pathak v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12423 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Nitu Pathak Wife of Mithilesh Pathak, resident of Village - Jaso, Police Station - Buxar Muffasil, in the district of Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home and Internal Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi.

2. The Secretary, Ministry of Home and Internal Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi.

3. The Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.

4. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

7. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

8. The Inspector General of Police, Patna Zone, Patna.

9. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Dehri-on-sone, Sahabad Range, Rohtas.

10. The District Magistrate, Buxar.

11. The Superintendent of Police, Buxar.

12. The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Buxar.

13. Securities and Exchange, Board of India through its Assistant General Manager, Patna Local Office, 3rd Floor Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

14. Assistant General Manager, SEBI, Patna Local Office, 3rd Floor Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.N. Shahi- AAG-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 20-01-2016 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned C.G.C, for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Heard also Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.12423 of 2015 (2) dt.20-01-2016 AC to AAG-10, appearing for the State-respondent Nos. 4 to 12, and Mr. R.R.Jha, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 13 and 14. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to take recourse to appropriate provisions of law.

To the submissions so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate provisions of law. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) A.I./- U