← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55319/2019bail granted

Kajal @ Shahin Pravin v. The State Of Bihar

2019-09-02Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55319 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2410 Year-2017 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

KAJAL @ SHAHIN PRAVIN Daughter of Manir Alam Resident of VillageSakhe Ramdas, Police Station- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj. 2.

Rabeya Khatoon Wife of Maneer alam Resident of Village- Sakhe Ramdas, Police Station-Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Khushbun Nisha wife of Amir Alam Resident of Village- Sakhe Ramdas, Police Station-Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj. Daughter of Late Mahmudin Miyan At present resident of village Mahuwa Police Station- Kuchaikote, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.2410 of 2017/Trial No.1838 of 2019 registered under Sections 498A and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is of torturing and causing assault to the opposite party no.2 by her husband and other in-laws for non-fulfillment of the dowry demand and removing the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial house by snatching her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55319 of 2019(2) dt.02-09-2019 2/2 personal belongings.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no.1 is daughter and the petitioner no.2 is the wife of the brother-in-law of the opposite party no.2 and both have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender by them within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Gopalganj, in connection with Complaint Case No.2410 of 2017/Trial No.1838 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T