← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53742/2019bail granted

Ranjan Khaliffa v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-27Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53742 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2017 Thana- MAHILA THANA District- Begusarai ====================================================== RANJAN KHALIFFA Son of Late Umesh Khaliffa Resident of VillageBakhari, P.S.-Bakhari, District-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 370, 373, 323, 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 14 of POCSO Act.

The prosecution case in short is that the informant was sold by her mother to the accused persons and they were pressurizing the informant for evil work.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 11.6.2019 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the present case. It is alleged that the petitioner was running brothel. The allegation is denied by the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53742 of 2019(2) dt.27-08-2019 2/2 The petitioner has been made accused due to mistake of fact. There is no substantive evidence to suggest his implication in the present case.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R..

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Additional Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, POCSO Act, Begusarai in connection with POCSO Case No. 36 of 2019 (Mahila P.S. Case No. 30 of 2017).

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T