Jag Narayan Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25091 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2017 Thana -KARAHGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Jag Narayan Singh, s/o late Phulan Singh

2. Urmila Devi, w/o Jag Narayan singh Both are resident of village-Karoop, P.S.-Karahgar, District-Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 06-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Karahgar P.S. Case No. 07 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are parents-in-law of the deceased.

From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25091 of 2017 (3) dt.06-07-2017 2/2 six weeks from today, in connection with Karahgar P.S. Case No. No. 07 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram (Rohtas), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T