Mridula Devi And ANR v. Prem Narain Singh And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Revision No.223 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Mridula Devi Wife of Late Kapildeo Singh

2. Pankaj Kumar S/o Late Kapildeo Singh Both residents of village - Rohua Appuchh, P.O. Mushahari Farm, P.S. Mushari, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Prem Narain Singh S/o Late Baijnath Singh

2. Dilip Kumar S/o Sri Prem Narain Singh

3. Seema Devi Widow of Late Santosh Kumar

4. Divya Kumari

5. Neha Kumari Both Minor daughter of Late Santosh Kumar both living under the guardianship of their Mother and natural guardian Seema Devi

6. Mudrika Devi Wife of Late Nirmal Narain Singh

7. Krishn Mohan Singh Son of Late Nirmal Narain Singh, All residents of village - Rohua Appuchh, P.O. Mushahari Farm, P.S. Mushahari, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate Mr. Natraj Verma, Advocate For Opp.Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. Najeeb Ahmad, Advocate Mr. Sajit Salim Khan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 09-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners has urged that the learned court below has committed illegality in passing the impugned order rejecting the compromise petition filed by the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the opposite parties has supported the impugned order.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for

Patna High Court C.R. No.223 of 2016 (5) dt.09-05-2017 2/2 the parties and the materials on record, this Court finds that the learned court below has not committed any error in passing the impugned order.

The revision application is dismissed.

(V. Nath, J) S.Pandey/- U