Ram Briksh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24805 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2015 Thana -KADAMKUAN District- PATNA ====================================================== Ram Briksh Kumar, Son of Late Mahendra Singh, Resident of Banni Tola, Chaidha, Police Station Mahesh Khunt, District Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/ :
Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/:
Mr. Rajballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 49 of 2015, registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna. The allegation of informant Raju Kumar is that he used to do the part time job in E-com Express. On 03.02.2015 at about 3.00 P.M. he went to deliver a parcel at Ward No.48, House No. 80, Yadav Lane, Muslahpur, Mahendru in the name of Avinash Kumar Mehta on which mobile No. 9570941549 was indicated. The informant reached there and informed about the parcel on the said mobile and he met with him who call him to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24805 of 2017 (3) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 come in the house to receive money worth of Rs. 11,398/-, when informant tried to go in his house then he snatched his parcel and fled away.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. In course of investigation it has come in para 52 of the case diary that mobile number, which was shown on the parcel belongs to this petitioner. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trail Court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T