← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/15068/2016disposed

Md. Firoz v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-08Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15068 of 2016 =========================================================== Md. Firoz, Son of Md. Jamil, Resident of Mohalla- Maripur, P.S. Kazi Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur, the retired Junior Engineer, Sone Command Area Development Agency, Dehri -on-Sone, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Regional Development Commissioner-cum- Chairman, Sone Command Area Development Agency (SCADA), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Sone Command Area Development Agency (SCADA), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

4. The Superintending Engineer, Sone Command Area Development Agency (SCADA), Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna.

5. The Executive Engineer, Sone Command Area Development Agency (SCADA), Dehri-on-Sone.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and respondents no. 2 to 5.

2. The issue relates to counting of service of the petitioner as Government service for the purposes of grant of pension.

3. It appears that various co-ordinate Benches of this Court, including a Division Bench, has passed orders in favour of the respondent authorities by not allowing such prayer. However, the matter is now pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No (s). 26820/2017.

Patna High Court CWJC No.15068 of 2016 dt.08-01-2018 2/2

4. Be that as it may, since, as of now, the issue stands decided against the petitioner, no relief can be granted to him.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to move the Court if there if any favourable order on the issue in favour of the petitioner in future.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Anand Kr.

AFR/NAFR U