Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59920/2023dismissed

Ramavtar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-11-08Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59920 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2023 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Ramavtar Yadav S/O Late Harakh Nath Chaudhary R/O Village- Tabkal Rai Ka Dera, Ps. Simri, Dist. Buxar 2.

Ramjee Yadav S/O Late Harakh Nath Chaudhary R/O Village- Tabkal Rai Ka Dera, Ps. Simri, Dist. Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-11-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. Abhay Kumar, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Simri (Hata O.P.) P.S. Case No. 187 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 337, 338, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 of the IPC was added.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and others are said to have assaulted the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59920 of 2023(3) dt.08-11-2023 2/2 this case. There is land dispute between the petitioners and informant's side.

5. A number of injuries have been found in the postmortem report. The petitioners are in jail since 08.06.2023.

6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners.

7. Considering the serious allegation levelled against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners for the present.

8. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

9. The petitioners may review their prayer for bail if there is no sufficient progress in the trial. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T