Kaushal Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66803 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2025 Thana- Banshi District- Arwal ====================================================== 1.

Kaushal Sharma S/o Late Rajendra Sharma R/o Village - Od Bigha, P.S - Banshi, District - Arwal 2.

Ram Krishna Sharma S/o Late Rajendra Sharma R/o Village - Od Bigha, P.S - Banshi, District - Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Mayank Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 118(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that Petitioner No. 1, namely Kaushal Sharma, fired from his pistol which missed and Petitioner No. 2, namely Ram Krishna Sharma, assaulted Abhikshek Kumar with sword.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case with ulterior motive. Though, as per

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66803 of 2025(5) dt.23-04-2026 2/2 F.I.R., there is allegation of firing against Petitioner No. 1 but no one has sustained any fire arm injuries and doctor has found the injury, allegedly caused by Petitioner No. 2, simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Arwal in connection with Bansi P.S. Case No. 16 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T