← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61741/2024bail granted

Jitendra Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61741 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2024 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Jitendra sharma Son of Late Umashankar Sharma Resident of VillageAranda, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 2.

Devanand Sharma Son of Late Umashankar Sharma Resident of VillageAranda, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 3.

Manish Kumar Sharma @ Manish Sharma Son of Devanand Sharma Resident of Village- Aranda, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan 4.

Deepu Kumar Sharma @ Deepu Sharma Son of Devanand Sharma Resident of Village- Aranda, P.S.- M.H. Nagar, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Ms. Lakshmi Kumari and Mr. Rajnish Prakash, all Advocates for Informant ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the Informant.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 504, 506/34 & 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegation against petitioners is of matrimonial cruelty and demand of dowry.

4. Petitioner no. 1 & 2 are brother-in-law and petitioner no. 3 & 4 are nephew of husband of the informant. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61741 of 2024(2) dt.17-09-2024 2/2 Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of informant and her husband.

5. Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Siwan / concerned court in connection with Hussainganj (M. H. Nagar) P.S. Case No. 236 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T