← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29663/2017bail granted

Rubi Kumari And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-07Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29663 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2017 Thana -HASPURA District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Rubi Kumari, Daughter of Doman Lal @ Doman Prasad @ Doman Lal Gupta

2. Pinki Kumari, Daughter of Doman Lal @ Doman Prasad @ Doman Lal Gupta

3. Rinki Kumari, Daughter of Doman Lal @ Doman Prasad @ Doman Lal Gupta

4. Rani Kumari, Daughter of Doman Lal @ Doman Prasad @ Doman Lal Gupta

5. Rekha Kumari @ Rekha, Daughter of Doman Lal @ Doman Prasad @ Doman Lal Gupta

6. Anand Kumar, Son of Doman Lal @ Doman Prasad @ Doman Lal Gupta

7. Sonu Kumar, Son of Doman Lal @ Doman Prasad @ Doman Lal Gupta

8. Doman Lal @ Doman Prasad @ Doman Lal Gupta, Son of Late Daroga Sao

9. Saraswati Devi, Wife of Doman Lal @ Doman Prasad @ Doman Lal Gupta All Resident of Masjid Gali, Near Durga Mandir Haspura, P.S.-Haspura, District-Aurangabad, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Mr. Shakib Ayaz, Advocates For the State : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 07-07-2017 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 498 (A), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It is contended that petitioner nos.1 and 5 are married

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29663 of 2017 (2) dt.07-07-2017 2 / 2 sister-in-law (Nanad), petitioner nos.2, 3 and 4 are unmarried sister-in-law of the informant, whereas petitioner nos. 6 and 7 are brother-in-law (Devar) and petitioner nos.8 and 9 are father-inlaw and mother-in-law respectively of the informant. It is further contended that the husband, though an accused, is now living along with her wife at her parental house and is pressurizing for partition in the family. It is also submitted that allegation is general and omnibus in nature. It is not specifically stated that as to who has caused injury as has been stated in the F.I.R.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the abovenamed petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today in Haspura P.S. Case No. 64/2017, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand Rupees) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under sub-section(2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Dr.