Sanjeet Mahto And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31672 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -227 Year- 2016 Thana -PAROO District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Sanjeet Mahto, son of Mukhi Mahto,

2. Dinesh Mahto, son of Late Ramashish Mahto,

3. Kishore Mahto, son of Late Ramashish Mahto,

4. Guriya Mahto, son of Daroga Mahto, All the resident of Village Fatehabad, P.S. Paroo, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s : None.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

No one appears for the State.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 227/2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 379, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

There are specific allegations of assault against the petitioners in the First Information Report. The learned Sessions Judge while rejecting the Anticipatory Bail Application of the petitioners have noticed the specific injuries.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31672 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 227/2016. The same is rejected. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR U T