Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16104 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Raju Kumar S/o Arun Kumar Gupta, R/o Vill. Bakhari, P.O. - Dhamsena, P.S. - Saurbazar, District - Saharsa.

2.

Sudhir Kumar Singh S/o Tarni Prasad Singh, R/o Vill. Bhagwatpur, P.O. Maina, P.S. - Mihisi, District - Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Secretary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The Director (Primary Education), Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Saharsa.

4.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa.

5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Saharsa. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Saurbazar, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District - Saharsa.

7.

The Block Education Officer Saurbazar, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District Saharsa.

8.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Sahuriya West, Saurbazar, Saharsa.

9.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Kathdumar, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Saharsa.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Ram Vinay Pd. Singh, AC to GA 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-11-2022

1. Keeping in view, the observations by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 16214 of 2019 (Md. Ataur Rahman & Ors. Vrs. The Union of India & Ors. ) and Analogous cases, (Category 'H'), dated 19.10.2022, the writ petition is disposed of in the following terms:

" CATEGORY H

Patna High Court CWJC No.16104 of 2022(2) dt.30-11-2022 2/2

01. After having examined generally the facts of each case, this Court finds that the directions as issued herein above for each category would also govern the petitioners. Herein, it is for the State Government to examine facts of each and every teacher in terms of the order passed above. The petitioners would be free to make individual appropriate representation mentioning their own facts and the authority above as designated by the Director Education shall after referring to the directions of this Court in the preceding para's pass a speaking order.

02. State Government considering the directions issued herein above, would also take decision with reference to the present petitioners. In spite thereto, if any grievance of any individual person is not meted out, he or she shall be free to individually file an appeal before the concerned District Appellate Authority for redressal of his or her grievance."

2. The writ petition is disposed of.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Sachin/- Item No. 46 U