Patna High CourtL.P.A/1203/2014disposed

Shakun Lal Rajak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-02-15Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1203 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14343 of 2013 ====================================================== Shakun Lal Rajak son of Late Saryug Rajak Resident of village - Shalmari, P.S. Shalmari, P.O. Shalmari District - Katihar, Pin - 855113 ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

2. Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea

3. Collector - cum - District Magistrate, Katihar

4. S.D.O., Barsoi, Sub Division, Distt. - Katihar

5. L.R. Dy. C., Barsoi, Sub Division, Distt. - Katihar

6. Circle Officer, Azam Nagar, P.S. ( O.P. Shalmari ) Sub Division, Barsoi, Distt. - Katihar

7. Afsar Shakil

8. Shamul Shajid

9. Shaquib Shanowar All sons of Late Wahiduj Zaman

10. Gausia Farzana wife of Late Afaquzzman No. 7 to 10, all resident of SOHARAGACHHI, P.O. Shalmari, P.S. Azamnagar, District - Katihar, PIN - 855113 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Jai Krishna Prasad For the Respondent/s :

Mr. AAG-6 ANJANI KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date : 15-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Counsel for the private-respondent informed the Court that this matter cannot be proceeded any further, since it becomes academic, now, in view of the development that the proceeding in terms of the notice, issued by the court of DCLR in Case No. 38 of

Patna High Court LPA No.1203 of 2014 dt.15-02-2018 2/2 2014, dated 23.05.2013, has now been dropped, when the entirety of the facts came to the knowledge of the DCLR. In view of the same, the order passed by the Learned Single Judge, dated 21.07.2014, asking the appellant to go and showcause before the DCLR, has no meaning now. Appeal stands disposed off, accordingly.

It is made clear that no steps in Case No. 38 of 2014 is now required to be taken.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) ( Nilu Agrawal, J) skm/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 17.02.2018 Transmission Date