Santosh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8231 of 2010 ====================================================== Santosh Ranjan, S/O Late Triveni Singh, R/O Village Rasalpur, P.S. Chandauti, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Secretariate, Patna.

2. The Chief Secretary, State of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Home Secretary, State of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Commissioner cum Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Joint Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Secretary, Department of Rural Development, State of Bihar, Secretariate, Patna.

7. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj, State of Bihar, Secretariate, Patna.

8. The Director, Panchayat Raj, Bihar, Patna.

9. The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

10. The District Magistrate cum Chairman, District Compassionate Committee, Gaya.

11. The Additional Collector cum Secretary, District Compassionate Committee, Gaya.

12. The Additional Collector, Naxal, Gaya.

13. The Deputy Collector, Establishment, Gaya.

14. The District Welfare Officer, Gaya.

15. The Superintendent Press and Forms, Bihar, Gaya.

16. The Phileria Officer, Gaya.

17. The District Land Conservation Officer, Gaya.

18. The Sub Divisional Animal Husbandry Officer, Gaya.

19. The Assistant Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Gaya.

20. The Deputy Superintendent (Education), Gaya.

21. The Executive Officer, National Savings, Gaya.

22. The Inspector, Homeguard, Gaya.

23. The Office Superintendent, Collectriate, Gaya. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kr. Dhirendra Pratap Singh For the Respondent/s : AC to Addl. Advocate General 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

11-04-2017 At the very outset, learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General - 5 submits that during pendency of the writ petition,

Patna High Court CWJC No.8231 of 2010 (2) dt.11-04-2017 2/2 grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. The submission made by learned State counsel was not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner.

Accordingly, there is no need to keep the matter pending.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U