Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36786/2015dismissed

Suresh Prasad @ Suresh Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-08-26Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36786 of 2015 (3) dt.26-08-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36786 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1713 Year- 2014 Thana -MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictMADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Suresh Prasad @ Suresh Kumar Son of Late Baidnath Prasad resident of village - Rampatti Bazar, P.S. Rajnagar, District - Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Archana Chaudhary W/o Suresh Kumar resident of village - Rampatti Bazar, P.S. Rajnagar, District - Madhubani at Present residing as D/o Ram Babu Chaudhary, resident of Mohalla - Lahan Bazar, Ward No. 7, P.S. Lahan, District - Siraha, Country Nepal .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Rab (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with C.R. No. 1713 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. In pursuance of order dated 21.08.2015, the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 appeared in the Court. After having detailed discussion with the petitioner and opposite party no. 2, it is evident that though the opposite party no. 2 is willing to go with the petitioner alongwith her 22 months child but the petitioner is absolutely recalcitrant and is not ready

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36786 of 2015 (3) dt.26-08-2015 to take her in matrimonial home.

At the time of hearing the petition on 21.08.2015, the petitioner had undertaken that he is ready and willing to keep the opposite party with full dignity and honour and in the light of the aforesaid undertaking, this Court had directed that no coercive steps should be taken against the petitioner but the picture which appears today is just contrary to the same.

Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner stands rejected.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T