Pushpanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58652 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Pushpanjay Kumar Son of Devendra Prasad @ Devendra Kumar Resident of Village- Meerchak, Ps- Warisaliganj, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S. Case No. 91 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 111 & 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The prosecution case is that on 23.06.2025, acting on information regarding fraudulent activities linked to mobile number 9608175295, a police raid was conducted at village Meerchak. From the possession of the petitioner, there is recovery of two mobile phones.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58652 of 2025(2) dt.01-09-2025 2/3 that the petitioner is in custody since 24-06-2025. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. So far as recovery of two mobile phones is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the one mobile phone belongs to the petitioner, whereas another is in the name of his uncle. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and there being recovery of two mobile phones from the possession of the petitioner, which belong to the petitioner and his uncle, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Nawada Cyber P.S.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58652 of 2025(2) dt.01-09-2025 3/3 Case No. 91 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T