← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56110/2025bail granted

Taukir @ Md. Taukir @ Tauquir @ Tauqir v. The State Of Bihar

2025-10-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56110 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2023 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia ====================================================== Taukir @ Md. Taukir @ Tauquir @ Tauqir S/o Faruk @ Faruque @ Farooque R/o Village- Pokhariya, P.S.Baisi, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-10-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, informant suspects that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, committed murder of his son.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56110 of 2025(2) dt.17-10-2025 2/3 Informant is not an eye-witness to the alleged occurrence and petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the ground that one day prior to the alleged occurrence, a scuffle took place between the deceased and this petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 04.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10859 of 2025 and order dated 16.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21679 of 2025. Charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2025. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, claim based on parity and period of custody, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Purnea in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56110 of 2025(2) dt.17-10-2025 3/3 Baisi P.S. Case No. 427 of 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T