Nagendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2798 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6122 of 2024 ====================================================== Nagendra Prasad Yadav Son of Jagdish Yadav, Resident of village - Lohara 6, Rathous P.S. Kamtaul, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Land Reforms and Revenue, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Commissoner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 4.

The Collector, Madhubani, District - Madhubani. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Benipatti, District - Madhubani. 6.

The Station House Officer, Bisfi District - Madhubani. 7.

The Circle Officer, Bisfi, District - Madhubani. 8.

Vijay Yadav, Son of Bikau Yadav, Resident of Rathus Tole Lohara, P.S. - Kamtaul, District - Madhubani.

9.

Uday Yadav, Son of Bikau Yadav, Resident of Rathus Tole Lohara, P.S. - Kamtaul, District - Madhubani.

10.

Jagat Yadav, Son of Ram Swaroop Yadav, Resident of Rathus Tole Lohara, P.S. - Kamtaul, District - Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadav, GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-09-2024

1. The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.6122 of 2024, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 06.08.2024.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the case could not be marked in the daily cause list,

Patna High Court MJC No.2798 of 2024(2) dt.06-09-2024 2/2 the learned counsel for the petitioner could not appear before this Court on the day the aforesaid writ petition was called out for hearing, hence the same has stood dismissed for want of prosecution, thus a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored.

3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.6122 of 2024 to its original file.

4. The present petition stands allowed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U