← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/457/2011disposed

Avinash Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-02Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.457 of 2011 ===========================================================

1. Avinash Kumar, Son of Sri Surendra Sharma, R/o Vill. Musipur Khaira, P.O. Aria, P.S. Daud Nagar, Distt. Aurangabad, Roll No. 641702000

2. Huleshwar Kumar, son of Sri Surendra Pd., R/o Mohalla - Deoarika Puri, Road No. 3, Lohiya Nagar, P.S. Patrakar Nagar, Distt. Patna, Roll No. 60780407. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through D.G.P., Bihar, Patna,

2. The Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment), Bihar, Patna through its Secretary,

3. The Chairman of the Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment), Bihar, Patna,

4. The Secretary of the Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment), Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : None.

For the Respondents 2 to 4:

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Mr. B.K. Mishra, Mr. Vivek Anand and Mr. Amritans, Advocates.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 02-01-2018 No one appears for the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment), Bihar representing respondents no. 2, 3 & 4 is present.

Earlier vide order dated 12.01.2011, this Court had directed to list this matter along with CWJC No. 14170/2010 and CWJC No. 14742/2010 and other analogous cases and when the matter was listed on 27.01.2012, the Court noticed that CWJC No.

Patna High Court CWJC No.457 of 2011 dt.02-01-2018 2/2 14742/2010 has already been disposed of. That day also, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. In view of the disposal of CWJC No. 14742/2010, the Court observed: "No orders need be passed". Learned counsel for the Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment), Bihar once again submits that in view of the disposal of CWJC No. 14742/2010 nothing remains for adjudication in the present Writ Petition. In Paragraph 9 of the Counter Affidavit filed on behalf these respondents it is specifically stated that these petitioners have been declared successful and selection letters were also sent to the petitioners.

In the aforesaid view of the matter, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. It is disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 02.01.2018 Transmission Date N/A