Hira Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.39616 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -40 Year- 2018 Thana -CHHATAPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================
1. Hira Ansari, Son of Late Baddo @ Badri Ansari, Resident of VillageSuryapur, Police Station- Chhatapur, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 40/2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by dabiya causing injury to son of the informant.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that some scuffle took place between the parties, in which injuries sustained by both sides. It has further been submitted that all injuries are simple in nature.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39616 of 2018 (3) dt.07-08-2018 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, IVth Supaul, in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 40/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T