Pragya Raj @ Vicky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38927 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -162 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Pragya Raj @ Vicky Kumar S/o Binod @ Bindu Prasad resident of village - Keshochak, P.S. Chiksaura, District Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S.Case No. 162 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner of having physical relationship with the informant on the pretext of marriage and thereafter he refused to marry her.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the whole prosecution case is false and concocted as petitioner never studied in the school which will appear from the statement of Headmaster of the school and as a matter of fact petitioner has studied in Agriculture University in Rajasthan and he has studied

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38927 of 2018 (3) dt.31-07-2018 2/2 there from and he got job in Bank and in order to pressurize for marrying her this false case has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to some paragraphs of the case diary in support of his contention.

Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail stating that petitioner has relationship with the informant and he has given his ATM card to the informant and paragraphs 6, 7 and 39 of the case diary clearly show that petitioner was in relationship with the informant.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order. With the above observation, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U