Sulo Nonia @ Surendra Mahato v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56559 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-1992 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== SULO NONIA @ SURENDRA MAHATO S/O Late Sheetal Nonia Resident of Village- Nagdah, P.S.- Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.), District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 399 & 402 of the Indian Penal Code.
This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 15-12-2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted. Earlier the petitioner was granted bail by the learned court below itself. The petitioner is a poor person. He had gone outside the State to earn his livelihood and in his absence, proper pairvi was not made in the case. The petitioner further undertakes that he will cooperate during the trial of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56559 of 2019(3) dt.05-11-2019 2/2 case.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-XIV, Begusarai in connection with Sessions Trial No. 177 of 1994 arising out of Town P.S. Case No. 344 of 1992 .
It is made clear that the petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed in the case and in case, he makes himself absent for two consecutive dates without any cogent reason, the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T