Sairun Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57755 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-430 Year-2021 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Sairun Khatoon W/O Ajajul Resident Of Village- Bakulia, P.S.- Ghorasahan District- East Champaran.

2.

Gulnaz Khatoon D/O Ajajul Resident Of Village- Bakulia, P.S.- Ghorasahan District- East Champaran.

3.

Sahnaz Khatoon D/O Ajajul Resident Of Village- Bakulia, P.S.- Ghorasahan District- East Champaran.

4.

Muskan Khatoon D/O Ajajul Resident Of Village- Bakulia, P.S.- Ghorasahan District- East Champaran.

5.

Anguri Khatoon D/O Ajajul Resident Of Village- Bakulia, P.S.- Ghorasahan District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhannjay Kumar No 2, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the daughter of informant was said to have married to co-accused Ful Mohammad. After some time her inlaws started torturing her demanding dowry. It is further alleged that due to non-fulfillment of dowry, the daughter of informant was killed by her in-laws.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57755 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioners are the in-laws of the deceased. The husband of the deceased was in judicial custody and is acquitted in the present case. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 430 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Shahnawaz/- U T