Deepak Kumar@ Dipu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63867 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Deepak Kumar@ Dipu Kumar Son of Bharat Chaudhari R/o Village - Bheriya, P.S. - Warisaliganj, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 81 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 111 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 66, 66(B), 66(c), 66(d) of the I.T. Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that on tracking suspicious mobile numbers, the police conducted a raid at village Fatha and Bheriya, apprehended several persons, recovered mobile phones and data sheets from their possession, and arrested them for alleged involvement in cyber offences.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63867 of 2025(3) dt.09-02-2026 2/2 name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner stating that accused persons including the petitioner are involved in Cyber crime.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also nature of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.

8. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the same shall be disposed of on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T