Ramesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13296 of 2024 ====================================================== Ramesh Prasad Son of Narsingh Prasad, R/o C/o Sumitra Bhawan, Dwarika Lane, Bigrahpur Road, P.O. GPO, P.S. Jakkanpur, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Finance Department, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Finance Lok Udam Beuro Department, State of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Bihar State Awas Parisad/Board, Patna. 4.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Awas Board, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kameshwar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mujtabaul Haque, GP 12 Mr. Vasant Vokas, AC to GP 12 For the Housing Board :

Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate Ms. Pratibha, Advocate Mr. Utsav, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-09-2024 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsels appearing for the State as well as Housing Board.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that petitioner seeks to file a detailed representation for the relief, as sought for in the present writ petition before the authority concerned and the same may be considered in light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Amresh Kumar Sinha & Ors. v. The State of Bihar & Ors. (SLP (C) Nos. 8219-8226 of 2016) as well as clarification made by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.13296 of 2024(2) dt.05-09-2024 2/2 Full Bench of this Court in case of Kamlanand Thakur vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (C.W.J.C. No. 18727 of 2017) and other analogous cases.

3. Considering the aforesaid submission made on behalf of petitioner, the petitioner is given liberty to file a detailed representation before the authority concerned, who shall dispose of the representation of the petitioner expeditiously in light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Amresh Kumar Sinha (Supra) and the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Kamlanand Thakur (Supra) subject to the condition after verifying from the service particulars of the petitioner, as to whether, he has faced any disciplinary action affecting the pay scale.

4. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

5. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U