Sonu Mistry @ Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42229 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Sonu Mistry @ Sonu Kumar, Son of Ajit Mistry, Resident of VillageBhadauni, P.S.- Nawada Town, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S.Case No.428 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of stabbing the informant twice causing injury to him.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the injuries are found to be simple in nature and they have compromised the case, which will appear from the impugned order itself.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42229 of 2018 (3) dt.16-08-2018 2/2 the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nawada in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S.Case No.428 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T